Dial
As said before, the dial design of the C60 Trident Pro borrows from Rolex GMT Masters and Submariners, but adds some unique elements, giving it a distinct personality. Starting with the primary index, you have a series of applied rectangles at 3, 6, 9 and 12 and circles for the other hours. This gives the dial an immediate Sub-look, but the proportions of the circles and rectangles are quite different. There is also a double rectangle at 12, rather than the usual triangle. The applied markers are very nicely executed, each having a bit of polished steel around a white center that catches light nicely.
Around the very perimeter of the dial is a seconds/minutes index with small white hash marks. The lines are printed to a precision of 1/5th a second, which ties into the sweep of the seconds hand. Every 5 minutes is a small lume dot, which gives it a sort of vintage tritium dot look. One detail here that stands out is how the rectangular markers of the dial break into this index, giving the dial a bit of a crosshair look. I happen to like how this off sets the circular markers, which are further in towards the center.
The most interesting facet of the design, one that really distinguishes this watch and gives it a unique presence, is the pattern on the face itself. Instead of being a flat matte black, the dial has a series of wavy lines covering it. This bit of texture plays with light very nicely, and adds a bit of depth and intrigue to the dial. This is a level of detailing you don’t find too often in this price range, so it’s a real value adder. It’s also simply very attractive.
The bezel insert also adds some unique flavor to the watch. It’s an aluminum insert with markings that are reminiscent of Submariners, with long lines and numerals alternating. The first fifteen minutes is broken down to just lines every five and small dots for the minutes in between. Since it is an aluminum insert, the markers are actually gaps through the color showing the metal underneath. At 0/60 is a triangular marker with a molded lume pearl or pip.
The greatest feature here is the olive green “khaki” color (khaki in England and the US are defined a bit differently, it would seem). It’s not a color that I’ve ever seen used on a watch bezel before, and it’s truly gorgeous. It’s a dark green with bronzy undertones that looks like it was selected from a cutting of camo. It works beautifully with the dial underneath and adds an edge to the overall aesthetic that wouldn’t otherwise be there.
At just past 4 is a rectangular date window showing the black on white date. The window has a metal border, which gives it a similar look to one of the applied markers while also emphasizing it more. I find the implementation of the date to be pretty disruptive to the dial. On Subs and GMTs, the date is always at 3. While I understand wanting to separate the designs, having the date off center throws the balance of the dial. The window, which replaces the 4 o’clock marker, is also not exactly where 4 should be (it’s closer to 5), so it just feels awkward. It’s also further towards the center than the circular markers, which is due to the size of the movement, but that makes it feel like it’s just floating off. As convenient as it is to have a date, I would rather they had forgone it entirely to keep the symmetry and layout consistent or at least offered a no date option.
That hands of the C60 are quite a departure from the Rolex source material, yet work very well with the overall style of the watch. The hour and minute hands are both classically shaped, but have a sort of art deco twist in the form of tapering elongated tip. The hour hand then lightly refers to the Mercedes hand by being shorter and largely circular, though it lacks the triangular cross. The minute hand is then a large roman sword shape, which is quite different than what you’d find on Sub. The second hand is a long thin steel stick with a red tip and a trident on the opposite side. I quite like the trident, it is unique, reinforces the branding of the line and ties in with the waveform on the dial.
The C60 features lume on the hands, applied markers, small dots on the outer index and the bezel pearl. The lume pearl features green lume, while everything else has blue. Unfortunately, I found the quality to be very disappointing. Under direct charge from a UV flashlight, the pearl glows brightly, though it fades quickly, the hands glow medium strength also fading fast, and the dial barely glows. On the dial the small markers on the edge glow brightest, while the applied markers, despite their size, hardly glow at all. Considering this is a dive watch from a reputable brand, not to mention the quality of lume we’ve seen on cheaper dive watches made in Asia, I was very surprised by this. This doesn’t ruin the watch as ultimately it is a style piece with some dive specs, but I think it limits its potential greatly.
Nice review. One thing I’m surprised you didn’t mention was that the dial resembles that of an Omega Seamaster 2531.80 and other similar references. I think if a Sub and a Seamaster had a baby, it would be this watch. The styling is almost a 50/50 mix of those two classic divers.
Very true! thanks for pointing that out.
Nice review. Do you mind if I ask what camera you use? Really great shots you posted.
Thanks Ruben!
Nothing fancy! I use a Canon T3i with a 60mm EF-S Macro. Great setup, since it’s still very easy to hand hold.
-zach
Love this watch. Have had the grey bezel C60 for 6 months now and it’s quite a strange watch in that it should wear much larger than it does. Held up side by side with the Steinhart Ocean 1 series, it appears to look larger and more chunky. It’s almost the same dimensions as my Steinhart Vintage Red (except the C60 has a taller case height), but the C60 is so much more comfortable. I really wish Steinhart had curved the lugs just a tad or made the lug horns a few mm shorter. I’m always adjusting the seesaw effect on the Steinhart but the C60 stays put despite it being a chunkier watch. Must agree with Shane about the Omega Seamaster vibe despite C Ward referencing the Rolex GMT. The hands, the wave pattern on the dial, the polished sections on the case and bracelet, the larger markers, all point to the Seamaster 2531.80 albeit with it’s own spin. Very beautiful watch and from an owners point of view I really appreciate that they took time to design the lugs in such a way that it sits perfectly on the wrist. Great review guys!
Look up Bremont Supermarine
yeah… more similar than I realized, thanks for pointing that out.
The khaki bezel always confused me before this article. I was never really sure how it’d really look. Seems like stock pictures never really do the watch justice. So thanks for reviewing it and the great pictures.
Hi
Hi,
Nice review,
I noticed that you systematically write the movement manufacturer’s name incorrectly: it is Sellita (not Selitta).
This one looks nice, but would look even nicer with a leather strap 🙂
Looks like a nice watch. Thank you for the opportunity of winning it!
Nice review!!! That bezel looks fantastic!!
Very thorough review of a fine piece. I’m glad you mentioned the backlash / slop in the bezel, my blue C60 exhibits the same issue. But it is a great looking watch for sure!
This is a great looking watch! I particularly like the dial detailing and signature trident second hand–definitely completes the sea-worthy feel. Dark leather NATO would be perfect!
Nice review, i like the seamaster dial mixed with the submariner style case.
They should use their old logo.
how can i order this guys? I want it so bad!
I don’t think the sub style will ever go out of style which is why it is timeless. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery and this watch is just that . The bezel color is awesome and the nato strap gives the option of different looks. I personally live an oyster band but the interchangability of the nato will suffice. Great watch
I have owned two different Christopher Ward watches in the past few years and have found them to be an outstanding value for the money. While I own several oversized watches that are all the rage right now, I very much appreciate CW’s more “midsize” watch collection. Add to this their outstanding Customer Service and you really have a winning combination. You just can’t go wrong IMHO.
I love the watch and I’d really love to win it!
Purchased this watch because of your review, you guys need to do more CW reviews!
Excellent watch, very happy =).
Do you recommend this or halios tropik?
Zach, is this color discontinued? Can’t find it on their site.
I can’t find it either!!! I was about to purchase on the spot, but where is this option?!!!!!!!
Unfortunately, it looks like it has been. Not a big fan of their new colors either, too bright.
Most of the reviews here are very positive. I wanted to provide an account of a different
experience with CWL to provide some balance.
I was in the market for a nice looking watch I could wear
daily. I have a Rolex that I don’t feel
comfortable leaving in my locker at the health club, working around the house,
etc. I had never heard of CWL until a colleague of mine at work gave me some
options for a “good” daily watch and CLW was on his list. He is a watch hobbyist and provided several “micobrands”
to check out. I realized with CLW I
would be buying a watch with very little general brand recognition but I got
comfortable with the quality from all the on line reviews and felt the C600 Trident
met my purpose.
I purchased the C600 in February 2015. The initial watch got stuck in USPS Chicago Customs
in route to Texas. When it did not clear
customs after 6 weeks, CWL had to reship
a replacement 2nd day air at their expense. To clean up this ominous beginning to my
saga, the original watch arrived a couple weeks later. I promptly sent it back without ever opening
the package. It cost me roughly $35 but
since they had sent me a watch 2nd day air when I was anxious to get the watch
I figured that was a small additional price to pay.
The watch was nice looking although maybe a little thicker than
comparable Tags, Rolexes, Tudor, etc.
Problem One. The
watch ran fast almost 50 sec per day. I
waited a couple months to see if it would get better but it did not. I took it to a repair shop here in Texas
where I have a relationship and for a minimal price they adjusted the timing
while I waited. I did not want to go
through the hassle of repackaging, going to the post office and waiting another
couple months for the watch to be returned so I opted for local repair and absorbed
an additional $50 dollars in costs.
Problem Two. While
winding the watch couple months later, the crown came right off in my hand.
(see attached picture). I am not a watch
hobbyist and had always assumed this was a solid part. I found it ironic since this is one of the
main features that give the watch its strong masculine look. The same watch maker put it back on- another additional
$35.
About 2 months later, the stem came off again. This time the watchmaker said he would have
to get a new part as the method he was using was obviously not going to work
long term and he did not want me to have any more problems.
Problem three. CLW
would not supply part, even though the watchmaker (auth. Rolex) knew exactly
what was needed. The only option left was
to send the watch back to CLW London.
I sent the watch back this spring. Yes another trip to the post office and
another $30. I knew from various forums
the CWL repair process was running about 8 weeks. When I did not hear anything from them I
contacted them to learn they never received the watch.
Problem Four. Now I
am out $900.
The lesson here is don’t
buy anything you cannot get serviced locally. This could have all been avoided if CLW would
just provide parts. Maybe adequate quality control on their end, the watch had numerous
issues, would have prevented it as well.
Spend a little more money and get a major brand! I could have had a Tag with several thousands
of repair shops in the USA with access to parts.
Good Luck whichever way you go, but now whenever my friend
gives out his micro brand list – I balance it with a different perspective. Not at all mad at him, I should have known
better!