If you ever find yourself in the fortunate position of reviewing watches, you’ll quickly start compiling a mental list of the watches you’d like to see, wear, and spend time with. It’ll be a long list, and no matter how many watches you try, it’s not a list that will ever get shorter. I’ve been doing this for a few years now, and one watch that has always been near the top of my list was the Leica ZM 2, a passive GMT watch made to a high standard from — and there’s no other way of putting this — a camera company. Unfortunately, the ZM 2 has managed to continually elude me. That is, until now.
There’s plenty to say about the ZM 2, but before we get into this too deeply, let’s get two things out of the way: First, I’m not sure it was a good move for Leica to rename its flagship watch so soon after launch. It’s confusing for the consumer, and a bit annoying to anyone trying to cover the watch. So, for clarity’s sake, let me say that the ZM 2 is the same watch launched under the L2 name a few years ago, and it’s the same watch that was reviewed under that name by other outlets. It’s a confusing move, one that has, I think, made it slightly harder for the ZM 2 to grab a foothold than it otherwise might have been.
Which is a bummer because (and this is my second point): This watch is great, full stop. I loved wearing the ZM 2, and I would happily own this watch should I ever find myself in a position to do so. I know some will question Leica’s thinking in launching a watch collection, but I can say with certainty that the Leica ZM 2 is an incredible watch. It’s a watch worthy of clear consideration by anyone who loves and values well-made things, and I was delighted to spend some time with Leica’s halo watch offering, as well as their M11-D Rangefinder camera, to get a better sense of why.
But First, The Camera Thing
It goes without saying that Leica is, first and foremost, a camera company. It’s how I first got to know them, and I’d imagine the same is true for most of you as well. Leica cameras have long held an admirable seat in the watch world. Go to any watch event, anywhere in the world, and you’re almost certain to find at least one Leica in the room. And that’s for good reason, because if you’re a watch enthusiast looking to step up your photography game, one name that’s bound to come up is Leica.
Seriously, if you love watches and are on the hunt for a decent camera (and can afford it), you should buy a Leica Q2. It’s what I did, and it’s what a shocking number of your favorite watch photographers have done (I do not count myself among their ranks, to be very clear). I love my Leica Q2. It is, without a doubt, the best camera I’ve ever owned, and it suits me perfectly. With its fixed 28mm lens, 47.3MP sensor, close focusing distance, and simple built-in macro mode, it does everything I need it to do, and it does it well and without complaint. Plus, I have the “Reporter Edition,” so it’s green, which just plain makes me happy.
My Q2 has also taught me a lot about Leica, a brand I’ve admired for years, because, for as much as I love the camera, it has its limitations. After over a year of shooting, I also feel comfortable saying that it’s not the camera I’d reach for if I were hunting for the truest synthesis of the “Leica Experience.” It does check a lot of the Leica boxes; it’s got a tack-sharp wide-angle lens and compact body, perfect for street photography and on-the-go shooting. Its construction is second to none, and as a tactile experience of a camera, it’s about as good as you’ll find. But, as I said, it does have its limitations.
It is, after all, a fixed-lens camera with a wide field of view and relatively slow auto-focus, so it’s not going to be the perfect fit for a wedding or portrait photographer. And it’s very digital. Yes, it has a manual focus ring and nice dials and buttons, but this is not the classic Leica rangefinder. For me, for most of what I want to do, most of the time, the Q2 is all the camera I want or need, and it’s given me a clue about what Leica is, but it still doesn’t totally answer the question that is Leica.
So what does? Well, just about every product offered in the Leica catalog could be described as a perfect product, but only in the right context. Leica is an experiential brand, one focused on delivering the absolute best rendering of an experience that really only they provide. They have no interest in being all things to all people in all situations. Instead, they are invested in creating Leicas, something they do with tremendous success, and no camera proves this more than the Leica M11-D, a modern powerhouse of a camera masquerading as the ultimate vintage throwback.
The Leica M11-D
I’ve never had to work that hard to take a picture. I got my first digital camera when I was nine or ten years old. I got my first iPhone in high school. Even now, as I’ve crossed into the deep end of cameras and (semi) serious photography, I’ve conspicuously avoided many of the challenges that come with a more traditional approach to photography. I mean, sure, I use manual focusing on my Q2, but only with focus peaking turned on. And I’ve got a pretty solid understanding of the exposure triangle, but I mostly shoot in aperture priority mode, and I benefit greatly from the screens and electronic viewfinders that let me compose and dial in my exposure in real time.
The M11-D offers none of those crutches, and it isn’t anything like the camera I’ve gotten used to over the last few years. I’d go so far as to say it’s about as stripped-back a digital camera as you can find these days. Sure, it has a crazy good 60 MP sensor and all the modern guts you could ask for in a high-end camera, but here there are no screens, no autofocus; it’s like someone grabbed an old film camera off the shelf, stuffed a digital sensor where the film should be, and sent it out the door. Which also makes the Leica M11-D probably the purest expression of a Leica rangefinder available today.
What it isn’t is easy. If you’re coming to the M11-D like me, without any background in film or rangefinder photography, the challenge of shooting the Leica M11-D is a wonderful and difficult one to overcome. In an era where the biggest concerns for photographers are pixel peeping and cloud storage, and where our lives are easily archived on the supercomputers in each of our pockets, the M11-D makes you work for your photos. It forces you to be more considered, to slow down, to really think about what you want out of each frame.
That takes some getting used to, and I’ll readily admit, coming home from my first day of shooting the M11-D, the pictures were terrible to the point that dropping the first batch of images into Lightroom was a genuinely rude awakening. Every image seemed to be crooked, out of focus, and dark. The sharpness for which Leica lenses are praised was wholly absent in my attempts to wrangle the M11-D. I just wasn’t used to the manual experience that was this Leica rangefinder. Also? I kept accidentally adjusting the exposure compensation dial, which didn’t help the situation.
Still, over the next few weeks, I got better. As I spent more time shooting with the M11-D, the hurdles that had seemed insurmountable on my first day shooting were increasingly appealing. I found I liked looking through the rangefinder and seeing the corner of the lens hood in the frame. I liked that I had to trust my instincts and experience to get a shot, and I liked that when I took a picture, I stayed tethered to the world, instead of to the three-inch screen on the back of my camera. And the pictures were getting better.









