For those of us without deep pockets, Orient watches present an incredible value. With their solid built quality, reliable workhorse movements (in-house, I might add), and often pleasing designs, they are hard to argue against, and they’re often on the short list when people ask us to point them in the direction of affordable and well-built mechanical watches.
One thing that Orient does exceptionally well is dress pieces. The ever-popular Bambino series is a great case in point, as are numerous watches across their Star and Classic collections. Today, we’re going hands-on with a new member to the latter–the Monarch.
Introduced in early Fall 2015, the Monarch is a unique vintage-inspired addition to the Orient family. I say unique because it is one of the few manual winders in the brand’s catalogue. Beyond that, it also features a domed sapphire crystal, a power-reserve indicator, and an exhibition case back–elements not often seen on a watch priced at a MSRP of $335, but even less so in a watch costing $234.50, which is the price after coupon. Let’s take a closer look.
I think you want “deep pockets,” not “steep.”
Thanks, fixed that
How long is your discount good for?
no expiration dare is set.
Check out Long Island Watches. Their website usually has Orients for significantly less than 30% off MSRP. I buy a ton of affordable watches off their site.
You know what this is? It is the watch that really shows Japanese humour that shows up on occasion in their approach to manufacture. I’m thinking those cute faux retro mini cars they do, for example. That exaggerated font is what makes the watch. It looks “oriental” and goes with the antiquated logo and even the name of the company! The whole thing has a playful, retro-feel. Its only missed opportunity is with the back. This is the place where an engraved or stamped Orient symbol would make this a completely realized retro-cheese masterpiece that could not be resisted, and right up there with the Mako USA. It makes me smile.
Strange decision to give this watch 18mm lugs and not 20, but otherwise, this seems like a well designed bargain.
1:2 lug width to case width (or slightly bigger) seems like a golden ratio of sorts, I was guessing this was another 42+ mm case. Definitely a strange decision to throw off the proportions with the narrow lugs instead.
This one is definitely on the list. Was surprised when I realized that Orient doesn’t usually make hand winding only watches. All of mine are strictly automatic!
Was tempted by the watch since the first time I saw it. Hand-wound, which is very rare (unfortunately) for Orient, with charismatic dial, cool hands, little touches like retro crown guard = it could be perfect, but this display back really bothers. Anyway for $234.50 it has no competitors at all. Well, maybe 1…
Who’s the competitor you have in mind?
I got LUCH Single Hand: extremely cheap hand-wound watch. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Stylish-One-Hand-Luch-Mechanical-Wristwatch-Mens-leather-Fashion-Vintage-Black-/321813193984
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Stylish-One-Single-Hand-Luch-Mechanical-Wristwatch-Mens-Vintage-Silver-Goldy-/221994206692
Its very thin, works okay for the price. Has LUCH in-house caliber 🙂
Hard to find fault with the price – but actually I’m not a one-hand watch kind of guy. Then again, for the cost of a nice Lu(n)ch … ;-). Is an in-house movement always preferable? Luch might not bring good luck.
I’m not a single-hand watch guy either, just got it for fun. And for the ridiculously low price 🙂 my croco strap for it costs twice lol
I can’t think of a single thing I don’t admire about this watch, and that’s extremely rare for me. If they don’t sell hundreds of thousands of these, then something is really wrong!
The watch is pretty nice, but that movement is soo ugly. I don’t have problem with the font, but really don’t like painted blue hands. It is a mixed bag for me in the end.
Im putting together a list of watches i want. This is definately going on that list.
I’m really going back and forth on this piece. On value alone it’s a great buy, but I love the font 50% of the time and hate it the other half. I agree with the comment that said it showed a sense of humor. Id called it “theatrical”. If I had a spare 250 in a jar, I’d do it, but I have to be a bit more judicious, and I’m probably gonna have to pass. I own 2 Orients already and my 2nd gen Bambino is my favorite watch. If only for that damn font….
utility in one word
I have this watch, in the eggshell, and let me say is is an absolute work of art! It is perfect in every way. The sunburst dial is so subtle, its hardly noticeable, except to give the face a nice sheen. I bought it when it first came out (sort of) on black Friday, and got 50% off and free shipping! However, when I purchased it, it said “semi-domed sapphire crystal”, now the website is stating its just “mineral crystal”. What’s up with that?
I just got this watch today, it’s better than the review suggests. $220 to my door from Orient including tax, it’s far better finished/feeling than my Alpinist or Cocktail Time, a similar use watch whose case isn’t well-finished for the price and twice as thick as it should be. Both those watches should be in this price range. The 38mm is perfect, in fact I showed it to a friend who grew up in the “bling”watch generation and he thought the size perfect. The light pearl dial looks expensive, the blued hands are more purple than the pictures suggest (correct blue is very difficult for computer screens) so they don’t feel like “we tried to fake blued hands” but instead “we chose a deep purple blue and had them dipped in paint”. My friend, who knows nothing of watches but recognizes a quality look and feel, thought the watch cost $3K. He thought the Cocktail Time in the hundreds of dollars. The 13mm doesn’t bother me for this case, it’s rounded and “mini-pocket watch” feeling, and very simple with a great carefully chosen font. The manual movement is a nice touch, cheap automatics have a clunky feel this movement doesn’t, and the PR indicator a wonderful bonus.
It is mineral crystal. Not saphire.
I am sure you are correct sir! I have a bad habit of using the words glass, mineral, sapphire, and crystal interchangeably when discussing the see-thru fronts and backs of watches.
Lol its just the Orient website, videos, etc, said it was saphire crystal, for at least a few months when the watch first came out. Recently they changed the website from saphire to mineral. When I inquired about it, they said them stating it was saphire was a mistake. I didn’t mean to sound rude, but just a little annoyed at Orient, as the deciding factor when I chose to buy the watch was the fact that i thought it was saphire
wow, that’s lame. We didn’t know that either… going to have to update the post to reflect that.
To be fair, does it really matter on a watch this inexpensive? And fwiw, the movement is nothing to look at anyway since there’s no rotor and the non-moving rather large faux-finished pot-metal plates are a bit like applying cheap lipstick to a pig. 😉
And I did not take your comment as rude at all; it was factually incorrect and thus thank you for offering the truth according to Orient themselves!
I often buy alligator straps for Seikos and Orients where the strap costs more than the watch. I simply do not care.
I bought one. I’m new to watches having worn Timex Expeditions and Swiss Army quartz watches most of my life – never too late to pick up a new hobby!. The power reserve complication is something that really makes living with mechanical watches easier. My first mechanical was a Seiko 5 without hand winding (4R36 movement does allow this and I will be buying a new Seiko 5 with this movement) and continually running down on the weekends was a pain. The Monarch is simple, beautiful and sized very well especially when taking the bubble shape of the case into account. I have worn the watch for 3 weeks never having had it run down. I have only once re-set the time and that was to synchronize with the exact time online (second hand is hackable). Orient strikes me as one of the rare finds in today’s world – an company with true integrity to its mission and values. Whenever I find such companies I reward them with my business.
The font does not bother me. I’m thinking, why not a Seiko ‘Laurel’ type font? but then I could never get passed Orient copying another watch so shamelessly. So I’m left applauding the quirk and originality of Orient designers, something entirely their own when everything has pretty much been done over and over. I think if they repeated this font on other watches it would become “that Orient type font” and would be liked precisely for that,
Hi every body,
It’s about 6 months that I am owning this watch and I have been very happy with it up to now. But just today, I noticed something:
Today when winding it, after the power reserve indicator was almost aligned to the full position, I decided to go little bit further to feel it with my hand that it is full (something that I don’t usually do). But surprisingly I found out that I can continue winding it for ever, and nothing special happens. I didn’t feel any great resistance in between. Now I am little bit worried that I might have damaged the watch. Although as I said I didn’t feel passing over the boundary of a considerable resistance. However, up to now it has been working fine (it happened about one hour ago). But just I thought it might be good to ask other people who own this watch if they have had any similar experience or they know any about this issue. So, any help is hugely appreciated 🙂
However, Ilya Ryvin (the writer of this article) has mentioned something in this article that makes me hopeful about every thing being OK with my watch. He has said that the movement of this watch is in principal an automatic movement that has been modified and has lost its rotor. And as automatic watches have a clutch mechanism that prevent them from being over-wound, I am thinking maybe that clutch system still exists in this watch and that’s what makes it possible to wind the watch for ever without feeling any considerable resistant boundary.
Don’t you think it will be silly in 21st century that mechanical or automatic watches from any manufacturer came without overwind protection?
Do you believe in the existence of an omelet without eggs?