Chronography 8: Meca-Quartz—Is It Really the Poor Relation?

Share this story:

What is it about meca-quartz chronos? They have a knack of getting an opinion from even the calmest, most relaxed of watchies. Like most arguments, it’s simple enough in principle. You can have a mechanical chronograph powered by a mainspring, regulated by a balance wheel and controlled with a set of precision levers, hammers and gears. Or you can have a meca-quartz chronograph, powered by a battery, regulated by a quartz crystal and controlled with a set of precision levers, hammers and gears. But suggest to some watchies that meca has a value all of its own and you might as well have tried to argue that Hublot make tasteful, restrained, classical timepieces.

So, is it the best of both worlds with quartz accuracy and a mechanical feel, or a battery-powered compromise gone too far?

Being blunt, the market has a very clear view indeed. Go shopping for IWC’s splendid meca-quartz Flieger ref. 3741-001 and you’ll pay around £1,900 ($2,778) on the secondhand market. Chase a very similar but mechanically-powered ref. 3706 and you’ll be handing over a number closer to £3,300 ($4,825).

IWC ref. 3706
IWC ref. 3741

Of course, there’s a huge irony here that exposes what a daft place Watchworld is. The meca-quartz will need less servicing than the mech, it will be more accurate and more robust, and it will look to all the world as though it’s powered by a coiled spring. You could even argue that, because quartz puts less of a torque strain on its components than spring-powered mechs, the meca-quartz is a more horologically pure choice. But it’s still less desirable and cheaper.  No one ever said watches (or watch collectors) had to make sense.

So what’s the difference between a meca-quartz movement and a mechanical one? At its simplest, a meca-quartz is as its name suggest—a hybrid. It has a battery powering the movement through coils and a quartz oscillator, but the chronograph is mechanically actuated and controlled. Push the start/stop button and the second hand steps into action—and resets—just like a mechanical movement would. Look inside the case and you’ll see proper heart pieces, reset hammers, and levers. In fact, the meca Piguet cal. 1271 rattrapante is a proper, high-end, vertical clutch column-wheel chronograph that just happens to be powered by a battery and regulated by a crystal. It’s a beauty of a movement, but still gets people turning up their horo-illogical noses because it doesn’t have a spring.

Breitling cal. 69; base Piguet 1271

This sort of irrationality has never bothered Seiko. You can trace the origins of the meca-quartz to their brilliant and properly ground-breaking 7a28 movement. Keep in mind that back in 1982, quartz chronographs were still going bleep bloop and flickering a screen of LCD digits. Seiko decided there was no reason that a watch shouldn’t have quartz accuracy with analogue legibility, and thus produced the 7a28.

Seiko 7a28

Seiko planned to take on the Swiss at their own game. So rather than a modular, disposable plastic movement, the 7aXX series boasts a proper, quasi-decorated 15-jewel metal movement that could be regulated, disassembled and repaired. It even has a very traditional finger damper spring on the centre seconds pinion. Seiko really threw investment, thinking and effort into this one. This explains why, despite often impressive abuse, so many survive.


So the 7a28 was a proto-meca that laid the foundation for the future. Okay, so the chronograph doesn’t snap-reset, and there are no hammers, levers or column wheels to keep things moving, but if the modern VK series of movements had a paternity test there’d be little doubt about the outcome (but more on the VK series later).

For the first real meca, though, you need to look to Jaeger LeCoultre and their 630 and 631 calibers. Introduced towards the end of the 1980s, these were impressively thin (half the depth of a Valjoux 7750) and, with the crystal oscillating at 32,768Hz, splendidly accurate, gaining or losing just a second or so per month. And if your watch-related OCD is particularly bad, the 630 series were all adjustable via a small screw on the backplate of the movement.

These weren’t utility engines either. JLC went to the trouble of rhodium plating the movements and finishing them with côtes de Genève. They found their way into IWCs—running Flieger watches as well as the Ingenieur and the Porsche Design series. JLC used them widely too, later adding a moon-phase complication as well as an alarm function.

JLC cal. 631

But it’s Seiko we have to thank for taking the meca-quartz idea and making it their own at a price that doesn’t cause a squeal. The cals. VK63, 67 and 83 are powering all sorts of watches from the likes of Autodromo to, well, Seiko. It’s not a pretty movement in the way the 7a28 or the cal. 630 were, but it does give the feel of a mechanical chronograph, and the visual action of one too.

Sneak a look inside and you’ll see that the VKs use proper levers, hammers, wheels and heart pieces. Push the top button and you get a crisp, mech-style snick and the chrono steps off smartly, ticking in 1/5 sec increments—just like a mech. Push the stop button at 4 o’clock and you get the same crisp, mechy snick as the chrono stops. Press it again and the hand snaps straight back to 12.  If I hadn’t let you in on the secret, you might just think you had an auto on your wrist.

On the VK series, the small running seconds is always at 6 o’clock, but the other dials vary a little. On the VK63, for example, there’s a 60-minute counter at 9 o’clock and a 24 hour sub-dial at 3. The VK67 moves the chronograph minute hand up to 12 o’clock and has a 12-hour recorder at 9.  The VK83 has a 20-minute chronograph sub-dial at 9 with the 24 hour hand at 3.


But being a wannabe auto is not the point of meca-quartz movement. Seiko’s VK movements have opened up the market to a whole range of interesting models from micro-watchmakers. To be fair, there have been some horrors too, but to see what’s possible, just nip over to the Autodromo website.

AUTODROMO_PROTOTIPO_REDMAN_LE_DIAL4With a meca-quartz, you get a far slimmer watch than one with, say, a traditional Valjoux 7750. And you get it for a fraction of the price too, so makers can afford to take a few more chances. You don’t get the lovely whizzy winding weight that characterizes the 7750, or the sense of having a tiny mechanical marvel on your wrist. Instead, you get a robust, wear-it-anywhere watch that you can haul out of the watch box without fuss.

Some in Watchworld, noses upturned, still think of mecas—and Seiko’s VK series in particular—as the equivalent of the Kia Boringo or Hyundai’s Santa Meh. In fact, they have an integrity and interest all of their own at a price that a lot of people can afford. That makes them much more like Mazda’s splendid MG/Lotus recreation the MX5/Miata. Something with an identity all of their own and well worth a test drive.

Mark developed a passion for watches at a young age. At 9, he was gifted an Omega Time Computer manual from a local watch maker and he finagled Rolex brochures from a local dealer. Today, residing in the Oxfordshire village of Bampton, Mark brings his technical expertise and robust watch knowledge to worn&wound.
markchristie mark_mcarthur_christie
  • TrevorXM

    What kills it for me is the stuttering dead zombie second hand on a quartz watch and the inability for the second hand to actually stop on the second markers (with a couple of rare exceptions). I would prefer a meca-quartz chronograph to have smooth running hands during regular use, and then when the chrono function is engaged, those hands take on a tick-tick-tick stop watch (quartz) movement. Basically the opposite of what they do now in these movements. If they could do that with a movement and have the second hand for the chrono function actually fall on the second marker all they way around, they would have me sold.

    • Mark McArthur-Christie

      That’s a fair point – the only quartzes I have that hit the markers are an eye-wateringly expensive Grand Seiko and a cheap-as-chips Citizen Eco. I always find the ‘zombie second hand’ idea interesting. Breguet worked out a way to make a naturally oscillating balance wheel show on the dial as individual seconds. And Omega made the mechanical Synchrobeat back in the ’50s – again with ‘dead’ seconds. So we want our quartzes to behave like mechs and our mechs (in some cases at least) to behave like a quartz. Watches are just endlessly fascinating!

    • G Miyata

      Bulovas precision quartz second hand sweeps.
      It would be nice to see that technology evolve or devolve into a precision meca-quartz movement

    • TelstarFirst

      I started reading this thread because I found myself wearing Pulsar with VK63 movement – haven’t worn it for about a year. You mention second hands not hitting the markers – one of my pet hates, well most of the Swiss might but I defy you to find a Citizen,Seiko or Casio which do that.

  • Isaac Lara

    Very well written and informative. Thanks!

    • Mark McArthur-Christie

      Thanks, Isaac – that’s kind of you!

  • malikknows

    Thanks very much for this story, Mark. I own the IWC Ref. 3471 you referenced. I paid $2,000 for it in 1999, which made me wonder how much that IWC 3706 would have cost back in the day. As I recall, it was considerably more so maybe my mega-quartz was less of a bad deal?

    Just FYI, it has been a great watch. I wore it on three overseas deployments, 2 to Iraq and one to Afghanistan. It shows the wear a bit but has worked flawlessly.

    In any event, I appreciated your story.

    • Mark McArthur-Christie

      I’d say your meca-quartz was a great deal – and a great watch too; all the more as it’s survived three deployments. It’s still odd (in my opinion) that the market doesn’t value them as highly as the ‘pure’ mechs. I’d have one in a heartbeat.

  • Stuart Mclennan

    I do love my 7a28, but now I feel like a need a mecha-quartz! 😀

  • JC

    Am really quite interested in this Meca-Quartz development. I think it’s great particularly for micro-brands. Can only mean better / more-interesting options for consumers…

    Curious… Do you happen to know if there is such a thing as a SOLAR-POWERED or KINETIC-POWERED Meca-Quartz ?

  • Jens Lipponer

    I just got a Pulsar chrono from the supercars range with the VK63 and it is a beautiful watch. It feels fantastic and up market. The functions work very well. I would like something a bit more, you know…. Branded but I do like Seiko and Pulsar watches, and even the cheaper Lorus ones as well. For me paying over $500 for a watch is anathema unless the resale value has serious potential for capital gain. I am thinking of starting a watch collection focusing on Seiko, Pulsar etc……….

  • TheBigOldDog

    Very informative. Thank you. Sounds like we share a similar perspective on horology.

  • Juan Portela

    The first time I saw these movements, they were offered by a company who let customers build their own watches online by selecting faces, hands, and straps. Unfortunately, their designs were quite derivative, with the chronograph bearing an ill-executed and unflattering resemblance to the Moonwatch. It is perhaps because of this associated bad copycat marketing that I turned my own nose up at these movements, and that is perhaps an unfair first look if not a poor first impression indeed.

    Thank you for this most interesting article, and an even handed look at these in general.

Article / Featured

Uniform Wares 250 Series

The 250 line from Uniform Wares marks an interesting new …