Dial and Hands
This is where the watch really gets interesting. As I already noted, the dial of the FSO M20 is inspired by the FSO Warszawa M20 car. Specifically, the design pulls heavily from the car’s odometer/speedometer. Let’s start from the outside and work our way in. The surface of the dial is split between two areas: an outer ring and an inner surface. The outer ring is relatively simple, displaying the hours track in Arabic numerals. The inner surface is where the dial becomes much more interesting.
First you have a minutes/seconds track with bars representing every value, except for every 5-minute interval which is indicated with raised half-spheres. Moving further in you have 4 concentric circles, adding a little texture to the otherwise flat dial. Flanking the hands are two faux screws, a detail that is true to the clocks inspiring the watch, but one that slightly cheapens the look of the dial. The painted on “screws” look inelegant, and I can’t help but compare it to the Stradale, which pulls off the same detail exceptionally by actually utilizing raised screws.
The hands are sort of a blunted dauphine style, with a line of yellow-colored lume going down the center. The seconds hand is unique in that it has a large metallic base, which stands out but isn’t an eyesore. The seconds hand is tipped in yellow lume as well. The overall design of the hands is certainly interesting, but arguably a bit counter-intuitive to actual time telling with the hours handing hitting the minutes track and the minutes hand hitting the hours track. That being the case, it hasn’t affected my ability to read the watch at a quick glance.
One of the most interesting details on the dial is the application of the date window, which is positioned slightly left of the 5 o’clock marker. It’s integrated into a strip of numbers reading “1951”–a reference to the M20’s first production year–with the date widow appearing at the right end of that strip. The date wheel pops, being that it is white text against a red base. Overall, it’s a well thought out design, even if slightly kitschy. It should be noted that the print quality on the date wheel of the sample is poor, and a bit surprising given the rest of the watch. That being said, I found some user images of the watch online with perfect date wheels, so the review sample provided may very well be a production sample and not the final product.
I remember 2 years ago when I first saw photos of the watch. I’d love to see the date be a big date that integrates into the mileage better. Aside from that, I love the crown and design of the watch. I’d like to see a more mainstream affordable movement, but that’s mostly because the Chinese movements have an air of mystery (and cloning) around them and people don’t trust them.
(Hate to harp on it, but I still think you need a single page view for reviews. Please.)
Very nice styling, although it’s a hodge-podge of other watches. I wouldn’t be caught dead with one because of the Chinese movement. There are so many other “real” brands near this price point with movements that’ll last more than a month.
Why do you think this movement will only last a month (or less than an ETA for that matter)? You should probably look around the web a bit more. There’s been detailed analysis of ETA movements vs their clones frankly there’s no differences worth mentioning.
This is pretty ancient technology, after all.
There is a huge difference. Any watch repairer who takes the two apart
discovers very crude cost-cutting gears, sloppy assembly, oil all over
the place, poor finishing, dirt, dead skin, hairs, even flakes of brass grindings on the jewels (!), and plenty of
evidence of the Chinese knock-offs not being put together in a properly
clean environment. Not to mention the ethical concerns of slave labour
level sweatshops vs. decent employee environments. That alone would stop
me from ever buying a Chinese knock-off movement. The well known internet watch repairer watchguy has just one of
MANY write-ups on the subject, with both an ETA movement and a Sea-gull and another cheap knock-off
taken apart and compared. Unfortunately I can’t put up a link to it or my post gets deleted as spam automatically, so you’ll have to Google: Comparison: Sea-Gull ST2130, ETA 2824-2, Peacock SL3000
Thanks for the link! After reading through it though, it doesn’t support your assertion. Sure the ETA is cleaner out of the factory, but this can be fixed with a cleaning/service. As far as performance/materials are concerned, the movements are all pretty much the same (with the ETA being a more crisp around the edges).
After reading Watchguy’s article, I’d have zero problems buying a seagull-based watch from a watch company with decent QC.
“I’d have zero problems buying a seagull-based watch from a watch company with decent QC.”
OH? And which company would that be, exactly? Whom do you know for a fact pulls them all apart and rebuilds them to make sure they work properly? I’ve never seen that advertised anywhere.
And you have no problem with sweatshop slave labour, either?
You’re making sweeping generalizations about Chinese labor. They won’t stand the test of time
i own 3 Xicorr’s with Seagull AAA movements, all run perfectly 1 for more than 3 years. I wish people with no experience of a product refrain from comments.
All my seagulls are still flying. Some are 4 years old
Wow cool watch! A dead ringer for he autodromo stradale.
As far as the looks goes, Xicorr watches look nice. Though a bit hodge podge about the movements, I would rather buy one as long as it doesn’t have a bad reputation, after all they are nothing new in technology. Over all I like them.
As far as
the looks goes, Xicorr watches look nice. Though a bit hodge podge about the
movements, I would rather buy one as long as it doesn’t have a bad
reputation, after all they are nothing new in technology. Over all I like
them.
Can someone please give me a name or names of other similar watches? Thanks!